RESULTS SEMINAR 2003BRUSSELS / BELGIUM
National LEVEL 3 Marie Christine Meire PASS National LEVEL 2 Joelle Gasser FAILED Cindy Caille FAILED Nikolaos Efkarpidis PASS Sina Buehler PASS Thalia Ringa PASS Nikou Lambros PASS Karen Dombrecht FAILED Christophe Meersschaert PASS Emmanuel Ceulemans FAILED Dimitri Vandenbogaerde PASS Christine Tuaz PASS Nick Vandommele PASS NATIONAL LEVEL 1 ( INT LEVEL 2 ) Florence Masson PASS Christelle Zilli Carmin PASS Raffaele Valentino PASS Patrick Steiner FAILED Stefano Duranti PASS Marc Plancherel PASS INTERNATIONAL LEVEL 1 Johan Callebert PASS Christian Butty PASS Clémence Faure FAILED Regis Comune PASS Danilo Gentile PASS CALCULATOR NAT Joelle Gasser PASS Emmanuel Ceulemans PASS Hervé Wagneur PASS Florian Butty FAILED Cindy Caille PASS Sina Buehler PASS
GENERAL SUMMARY OF JUDGING EXAMINATIONS Thank you for attending the recent seminar hosted by the Belgium Waterski & Wakeboard Federation. It was good to see so many people attend and the level of involvement within the class was its highest yet with 45 people present from 9 different countries. As mentioned at the seminar, the examination is set at a particular level to encourage judges and offer assistance. The purpose of this is to give a brief summary of the results. Whilst we can all learn rules world for word, practise is the key and I encourage each of the participants to gain experience in the boat over the summer. National Level 2 Generally the results for the multi-choice examination were excellent, however, the video analysis proved to be problematic for some. During the seminar over the weekend it was clear that most of the attendees recognised the tricks, but when coming to analyse this in a video examination this proved more difficult. People seemed to know most of the inverts, however, it was clear that numerous individuals did not correctly state the grabs. It was also noted that individuals did not write down when a fall occurred. During the weekend we commented that it was not just knowing the tricks that counted but how they were performed - poorly executed, low intensity, landing on top of wake – these are the deciding factors that one needs to deal with at an actual event to decide which rider is the best under subjective scoring and many candidates failed to make sufficient notes. National Level 1 (International Level 2) Excellent with recognising the tricks, however many did not recognise a back roll to blind and this was common with almost all of those that took this level of exam. A number of people did not write down the Double-Up trick and some missed out the next trick after a difficult manoeuvre. Clearly one’s mind was still thinking of the previous trick. Recognising a Moby Dick was also an issue that some people missed. As with National Level 2, and as mentioned before, practise in the boat is essential. International Level 1 Congratulations are in order to the couple of individuals that spotted the Big Worm – front side Whirly Bird 540 - and also the person that spotted the Switch off axis 540 to blind. Back Roll to Blind for some still seemed to be a problem and caused confusion. A number of people put this down as a Handle Pass KGB. Unfortunately some missed the Double-Up manoeuvre and there are no excuses for not writing this trick down at an International Level 1 standard. As you can appreciate we cannot evaluate every candidate’s examination paper on an individual basis and so I hope you find these general comments constructive. I would like to personally thank you all for attending and would also like to thank Iris van der Voort (EWA Committee Member) for assisting and Alain Nieles (EWA President) for organising and helping with the whole presentation. If you have not been successful in the examination do not be discouraged, just like riding - experience and practise is required to achieve results. I look forward to seeing you all in 2004. Best wishes and have a great Summer. Colin Hart |
|
|